**SPOILERS HEREIN!**
Easily the
two biggest movies of the year were the superhero pictures The Avengers and The Dark
Knight Rises. Both films were major movie
events for comic book fans and casual moviegoers alike. Both grossed over $1 billion worldwide, though
with a nearly half-billion-dollar lead, The
Avengers (released on video today) won the battle at the box office.
But which is the better movie? Here are my thoughts:
Story: The Avengers
The Dark Knight Rises packs in enough storylines to make
two three-hour movies, and as a result, a lot of plot points are
fleeting. The main story of Gotham City being taken over and cut off from
the rest of the world is compelling, but Bruce Wayne lingering in a pit for
much of the picture, not so much. The Avengers, however, gives each
character a meaningful part, while still managing to tell a coherent, if
simpler, story. It has the advantage of
all the characters’ individual films leading into it, but that is still quite an
accomplishment.
Heroes: The Avengers
Not that
Christian Bale is a bad Batman, but he’s out of action for much of The Dark Knight Rises. In contrast, every team member in The Avengers gets a moment to be the
hero, drop a one-liner, and advance their character‘s story. Robert Downey, Jr., and Chris Evans are great
once again as Iron Man and Captain America, respectively, Chris Hemsworth is
even better than he was in Thor, Scarlett
Johansson and Jeremy Renner develop from background characters into strong
leads as Black Widow and Hawkeye, and Mark Ruffalo succeeds in taking over as
Bruce Banner (though the real star of this role is the CGI Hulk).
Batman can still take them, though. Just ask the Justice League. |
Villains: The Dark Knight Rises
Despite the
mask muffling his speech, Tom Hardy is quite imposing as Bane. When he starts throwing punches, it hurts to
watch a little bit, especially when he mops the floor with Batman early in the
movie. Tom Hiddleston’s Loki is entertaining,
but he seems more comedic than evil at times, which Bane never does. Bane also gets an edge for taking over Gotham
on his own, whereas Loki’s plan to conquer Earth relied on help from the alien
Chitauri (and failed).
Supporting
Players: The Dark Knight Rises
Oldman's role as Gordon was one of his best. |
The Avengers has Samuel L. Jackson’s Nick Fury
looking cool in an eye patch and Agent Coulson (Clark Gregg) revealed as a giddy
Captain America fanboy (though his death is surprisingly more emotional than
expected). The Dark Knight Rises has Gary Oldman and Joseph Gordon-Levitt
protecting Gotham City in the Bat’s absence, Anne Hathaway capturing Catwoman
perfectly (though she could have used some more screen time), and Oscar winners
Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, and Marion Cotillard all in major roles. No contest. While we’re at it, Oldman deserves an Oscar for playing Commissioner
Gordon!
Fight
Scenes: The Avengers
Both have
some terrific action sequences with cool special effects, so this one’s close
to a wash. But there is one tiebreaker:
In The Dark Knight Rises, Batman
subdues Bane in the final battle by simply dislodging a small tube from his
mask; after a short respite and plot twist, Bane anticlimactically meets his
end from a gunshot. In The Avengers…well, just watch what
happens to Loki. Take a guess which one
got more cheers at the midnight show.
Humor:
The Avengers
This
one is easy. The Dark Knight Rises has little time nor place for laughter in its
super-dark story. In The Avengers, the whole cast has great
chemistry, and keeps us all laughing with one-liners, funny gags, and pop
culture references (Captain America’s ignorance in that department is also amusing)
between—and during—all the action sequences. The short, silent scene after the credits is also an
instant-classic.
Sequel
Potential: Even
The Marvel
Universe films always leave clues to future movies after the credits, and The Avengers is no exception. The movie shows a glimpse of the supervillain
Thanos, so we can expect to see him in a future movie. Christopher Nolan has said that The Dark Knight Rises will be his last Batman
picture, but the ending leaves it open for the Dark Knight to return, and
suggests Gordon-Levitt’s John Blake will take up masked heroism himself. It’s a compelling prospect, as he held his
own in the picture alongside Batman and Gordon.
The film does lose points for straying from continuity, though; “Robin
John Blake?” Couldn’t he have just been
Dick Grayson?
Hype: The Avengers
The Avengers was the massive crossover event that the whole Marvel film
series had been building toward since it started with Iron Man in 2008. The
Dark Knight Rises was the follow-up to The
Dark Knight, not only the gold standard for comic book movies, but one of
the best films of the new millennium on any level. Both films opened with
more hype than any picture in recent memory. Amazingly, The Avengers lived up to every bit of
it, maybe even surpassed it. While The
Dark Knight Rises wrapped up the series well, it didn’t reach the same
level as its predecessor (which admittedly would have been nearly impossible).
Winner:
The Dark Knight Rises is a well-made and satisfying ending to Christopher Nolan’s
Batman series, but it has its flaws. The
Avengers is the perfect superhero movie, with just the right balance of
humor, character, and action. It’s an excellent example of how to make an
ensemble film with so many stars right.
And
I say this as a fan of DC more than Marvel. Here’s hoping the Justice League movie is this good (if they finally get
the project started already).
I think you're missing a category, which to me is one of the most important: Meaning. DKR is more meaningful because its characters evolve over the course of the film. The Avengers only learn not to fight with each other, and that's only because Phil died. That, and I think DKR does more with the theme of heroism - anyone can be Batman because anyone can be a hero (cf. Selina and Foley).
ReplyDeleteFinally, I think DKR has better structural unity than Avengers because, while Avengers is a payoff, DKR pays itself off in that nothing in the film is wasted; everything cycles back on itself, everything matters, and it's a complete story in itself. Avengers feels more like another chapter in the MCU; it's a great next chapter, perhaps the best (although I still love the original Iron Man to death), but it doesn't resolve very much.
Okay, I had one more thought. Avengers is a fantastic comic book movie and captures perfectly the experience of reading a summer event comic. DKR is a great movie, no qualifying adjectives; it takes the best of what comics can do and does that with the best that film can do.
Yeah, admittedly, I didn't dissect them thematically as much as just the pure enjoyment factor. I'll have to revisit it and think about it more when the DVD comes out.
DeleteAs for the structure, I'll have to disagree, because I thought DKR was a little too disjointed just because they packed so much in. I think instead of making a point to tie up every little loose end from the first two movies, they should have allowed for a little more development on some plot points (like the fact that a few months of Bane's rule in Gotham passes in only about an hour of film, the business dealing stuff with Dagget, and especially Catwoman, who I though seemed almost like a secondary character). Avengers had the advantage of all the previous movies to establish the characters' backstories, so even with all the characters in one movie, it was remarkably well-structured because it didn't need to give them a very long introduction.
I do agree that not a scene is wasted in DKR. I've noticed that in Nolan's movies: there's never a slow or unnecessary scene. His movies are so engrossing because he wastes no time.