2002’s Minority Report is an underrated gem in the careers of Steven
Spielberg and Tom Cruise, a mind-bending noir mystery with some heavy and
interesting sci-fi concepts. Its main premise—a police force with the ability
to predict murders and arrest the killers before they happen—could make a great
series, a unique take on the police procedural that integrates cool sci-fi and
wrestles with ethical quandaries and free will. But, if this pilot is any
indication, the Minority Report show
we did get looks to have squandered all that potential and delivered a shallow,
flashy but empty series.
The opening sequence—a foot chase
with former precog (one of the three murder-predicting psychics for those who don’t
remember the film; the show’s a sequel, by the way) Dash (Stark Sands) rushing
through 2065 Washington, D.C., to stop a murder he envisioned, psychically one
step ahead of every obstacle—is the lone bright spot before the show plunges
into badness. He fails, but he’s tracked down by D.C. detective Lara Vega
(Meagan Good), just as he conveniently starts to have another vision, which is
conveniently related to the one at the beginning. Since Pre-Crime, as it was
called, is now illegal, the two conduct an off-the-books investigation to save
the impending victim.
That plot may not sound
particularly bad, or out of the ordinary for a pilot, and it isn’t. The problem
is that, for all the interesting possibilities the material presents, the show
focuses on none of them.
For example, the episode presents
a plot point in which former Pre-Crime arrestees were left with brain damage
from their imprisonment in suspended animation. It’s an idea with interesting
moral and story implications, but instead of exploring it, the moment is wasted
on some tired mismatched cop humor (and a pigeon joke, no less, a fitting
metaphor for the show’s treatment of the material). The pilot’s seemingly
attempting to establish the two leads as a comedic duo, which is not only very out
of place, but lacks even a sliver of humor, let alone chemistry between the two. Sands is little more than an extension of socially inept dolt
stereotype that’s getting really annoying by now (basically another clone of Sheldon from The Big Bang Theory), while Good’s character is so generic and underwhelming that I can’t really think of anything to say.
The show seems less interested in
its plot potential than showing off the technology of the future, which is an
unoriginal mix of Back to the Future Part
II-type zaniness and the logical extension of our current tablets and smart
phones (the movie’s technological predictions seem pretty off now, but its
story was strong enough that it still would have worked with Mystery Science Theater 3000-grade
effects). Worse, it also tries to be cute and funny with so many prophetic pop
culture references (though I did laugh at a Tinder joke). It’s almost like a live-action episode of Futurama,
minus the smart plotting, great characters, and actually being clever or witty
about all the cultural references.
Speaking of Futurama, couldn’t the much-discussed, amusing cross-promotion with The Simpsons have included Matt Groening’s head in a jar, as a sort of double reference? It wouldn’t have made the
show any better, but it still would have been cool!
No comments:
Post a Comment