Even giving a concise synopsis is
difficult, but I’ll take a stab at it: The setting is a far distant future
where humans have colonized space and live in a feudal empire of rival houses vying
for control of the cosmos. In this society, the most prized substance is “the spice,”
a chemical which gives humans the power to navigate through space using their
minds. “Spice” is only found on the desert planet Arrakis (aka “Dune,” though
rarely referred to as such on film), long controlled by the cruel House
Harkonnen, but coming under control of their rivals House Atreides as the story
opens. The plot mainly follows the young Paul Atreides (played onscreen by Timothée
Chalamet), who is plagued by visions of a future where he either dies or
becomes a messiah to the Fremen, the desert-dwelling native people of Arrakis.
Director Denis Villeneuve’s film
is a pretty good adaptation, for better and for worse. It certainly tries to
compact the book’s lore into digestible exposition. But this amounts to little
more than refresher cliff notes for the already familiar. Frankly, anyone who
hasn’t read Herbert’s novel will likely be lost at sea. Those who have,
however, will see as great a Dune movie as could probably be made.
It’s a beautiful film full of
visual wonders. The desert landscapes are stunning in their starkness, and the look—the sets, the costumes, the starships—is truly otherworldly. Like 2001:
A Space Odyssey or Blade Runner (Ridley Scott’s original or
Villeneuve’s sequel), the picture knows how cool it looks and takes it slow at times to give the viewer a
chance to just take in the incredible sights. When things are moving, the
action is never less than exciting, and a few battle sequences are absolutely breathtaking.
Villeneuve’s style can be a
little stiff for scenes of dialogue or emotion, but it absolutely fits the
material in this case. Herbert’s characters know they’re important people at
the center of major moments in their fictional history. This is certainly
reflected in the cast, who give scenes heavy on dialogue and exposition urgency
and momentum between the big moments.
As Paul, Chalamet practically
jumps off the page. He looks appropriately young and green, and is note-perfect
as someone who alternately knows he’s destined for something big, but is unsure
and not yet ready to face it. His visions of the future and the story’s present
coursing to intersect form the main narrative, and he anchors it splendidly.
This Dune is huge in
scope, fairly long in runtime, and meticulous in its craft. And yet, it still
isn’t big enough to contain Herbert’s tale. Even though the picture only covers
the first half of the book (it’s subtitled “Part One” on film), details still
get left out or eschewed to the background, characters reduced to near-cameos. Even
though the cast is terrific, aside from Chalamet, most don’t get much more
screentime than mere role players (Dune the book is often compared to The Lord
of the Rings, and the movie could definitely benefit from the same extended
cut treatment of Peter Jackson’s film trilogy).
It is, however, very faithful to
the spirit and vision of Herbert’s epic. For fans of the book, seeing scenes
from it come to life in all their glory and splendor is pretty thrilling. For
everyone else, I can’t say for certain if it’ll provide much clarity, but it might
be worth doing a little homework brushing up on the basics of Dune’s mythology, to at least try to understand what those vivid images on the screen mean. I so
strongly hope we get to see “Part Two.”
"Hello I am from gacorteros.com, i was reading ur article and it very useful for me,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this useful infomation. you are a talented writer, I'm waiting for your next article :)"